Security services across the cloud lifecycle

Overview

A structured evaluation of your cloud environment — identity, network, data, and detection — against best practice and your target frameworks, whether you run on one provider or several.

Business Value

A prioritized view of real risk, so budget goes where it reduces exposure most.

Common Challenges

• Sprawling multi-account environments with unclear ownership
• Misconfigurations that accumulate faster than they're caught
• No baseline to measure posture against

Deliverables

• Posture assessment report with risk ratings
• Prioritized remediation roadmap
• Executive summary for leadership

Expected Outcomes

A defensible baseline and a ranked action plan, with the highest-impact risks known and being addressed.

Overview

Hands-on review of identity, networking, logging, detection, architecture and governance — measured against each provider's own security baseline, such as the AWS Well-Architected security pillar, the Microsoft Cloud Security Benchmark, or Google's Cloud Foundation blueprints.

Native tooling we tune

• AWS — IAM, GuardDuty, Inspector, Security Hub, Config, etc.
• Azure — Entra ID, Defender for Cloud, Sentinel, Policy, etc.
• Google Cloud — IAM, Security Command Center, Asset Inventory, etc.

Business Value

Maximize the security you've already paid for by tuning native controls correctly, closing gaps before they're exploited.

Common Challenges

• Over-permissive roles and unused access
• Detection services enabled but not actioned
• Inconsistent guardrails across accounts, subscriptions, projects and regions
• Each cloud secured to a different standard

Deliverables

• Detailed findings across identity, network, logging & detection
• Baseline configuration recommendations for each provider in scope
• Governance and account/subscription/project structure guidance

Expected Outcomes

Correctly configured native controls, least-privilege access, and detection that produces signal your team can act on.

Overview

Assessment and secure-by-design architecture for Kubernetes, whether managed (EKS, AKS, GKE) or self-hosted: RBAC, network policy, workload identity, supply chain, and runtime posture.

Business Value

Run containerized workloads at scale without turning your orchestration layer into your largest attack surface.

Common Challenges

• Default-open networking and broad RBAC
• Unverified images and weak supply-chain controls
• Limited runtime visibility inside clusters

Deliverables

• Cluster security assessment & findings
• Reference architecture for hardened managed clusters
• Policy and admission-control recommendations

Expected Outcomes

Hardened, well-segmented clusters with least-privilege workloads and a clear path to runtime visibility.

Overview

Integrating security across the SDLC, CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure-as-code, container builds, and cloud-native workflows.

Business Value

Catch issues earlier, ship faster, and reduce the cost of fixing security defects late in the cycle.

Common Challenges

• Security gating that slows delivery and breeds workarounds
• IaC and pipelines outside any security review
• Findings with no owner and no path to resolution

Deliverables

• Pipeline security integration plan
• IaC & container scanning guardrails
• Developer-friendly policy and workflow design

Expected Outcomes

Automated guardrails that developers trust, with security feedback delivered inside the tools they already use.

Overview

Readiness for the frameworks your buyers and regulators actually ask about — mapping requirements to your cloud architecture and closing control gaps before the auditor arrives.

Frameworks we work with

• Audited & certifiable — SOC 2, PCI DSS, ISO 27001 (with 27017 / 27018 for cloud)
• Regulatory — HIPAA
• Control & hardening baselines — NIST CSF, CIS Benchmarks, CSA Cloud Controls Matrix, etc.

Business Value

Win enterprise deals and satisfy regulators without diverting engineering for months of unstructured scramble.

Common Challenges

• Requirements that don't obviously map to cloud services
• Overlapping frameworks demanding the same evidence twice
• Evidence scattered, manual, or missing
• Controls that pass an audit but don't reduce risk

Deliverables

• Framework gap analysis & control mapping
• Remediation plan with owners and priorities
• Evidence-collection guidance for audit

Expected Outcomes

A defensible control set, organized evidence, and a calmer, faster path through audit — with security that actually holds.

Overview

Embedded security leadership covering governance, strategy, risk management, and security-program development, scaled to your stage.

Business Value

Executive-grade security direction without the cost and lead time of a full-time CISO hire.

Common Challenges

• Security decisions with no clear owner
• Board, customers, and auditors asking questions no one can answer
• No coherent multi-quarter security roadmap

Deliverables

• Security strategy & roadmap
• Risk register and governance cadence
• Stakeholder, board & customer reporting

Expected Outcomes

A clear security direction, accountable governance, and confident answers for your board, customers, and auditors.

Overview

Security awareness for all staff plus technical, role-specific training for engineering, DevOps, and cloud teams.

Business Value

Reduce human-driven risk and build a workforce that makes secure choices by default.

Common Challenges

• Generic training that engineers tune out
• Cloud-specific risks never covered in depth
• No reinforcement after the annual checkbox

Deliverables

• Role-based training curriculum
• Cloud-specific technical sessions (AWS, Azure, GCP)
• Awareness materials and reinforcement plan

Expected Outcomes

Teams that recognize and avoid common risks, and engineers who build with security in mind from the start.